REVEALED: How American and Chinese scientists sought to create a virus in 2018 that was almost EXACT to Covid

Photo of author
Written By Daily Mail

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur pulvinar ligula augue quis venenatis. 

Explosive new documents shed light on a shady 2018 project between American and Chinese scientists to create a new virus with the same rare characteristics seen in Covid.

The proposals lay out plans to use American taxpayer money to engineer bat coronaviruses with several properties that would make them infectious to humans, a year before the pandemic struck.

The documents, which consist of hundreds of emails, grant applications and scientific papers, highlighted four characteristics that would make the new viruses a “clear… danger of a new SARS-like pandemic.”

The four characteristics detailed in the research proposal coincide with those of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid, according to a control body that exposed the files, as well as several experts who reviewed them.

The experiments, part of a grant known as DEFUSE, were to be a collaboration between American scientists and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is where the FBI and many scientists believe Covid leaked from.

The proposal was ultimately denied funding and there are no official records that the experiments were actually carried out. However, virology experts have said the records are a clear “plan” to create Covid-19.

The four characteristics that scientists looked for to create a new virus in the 2018 research proposal match those of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid.

The four characteristics that scientists looked for to create a new virus in the 2018 research proposal match those of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid.

Shi Zhengli, nicknamed the 'Bat Lady' or 'Bat Woman' for her work on bat coronaviruses, investigated the possibility that Covid could have emerged from her lab in 2020, according to her colleagues.

Shi Zhengli, nicknamed the ‘Bat Lady’ or ‘Bat Woman’ for her work on bat coronaviruses, investigated the possibility that Covid could have emerged from her lab in 2020, according to her colleagues.

Jamie Metzl, an adviser to the World Health Organization and founder of One Shared World, a group working to prevent the next pandemic, said in X that the documents refute the theory of Covid’s zoonotic origin: that the virus began in nature and spread to humans.

He tweeted: ‘The details of the 2018 DEFUSE proposal plus phylogenetic data make an extremely compelling case for an origin related to COVID19 research in Wuhan.

“The evidence for zoonoses in the wild or at the Huanan market is essentially nil.”

Dr. Richard Ebright, a chemical biologist at Rutgers University in New Jersey, tweeted that the proposal “provided step-by-step plans for construction of a virus that has the sequence and properties of” SARS-CoV-2.

He added: “The match between the evidence provided by the genome sequence and the evidence provided by the FOIA disclosure is remarkable and elevates the evidence provided by the genome sequence from the level of ‘notable’ to the level of ‘smoking gun.'” .

The documents come from a March 2018 grant proposal called Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-Transmitted Coronaviruses.

The DEFUSE project The proposal was made by the now famous EcoHealth Alliance, a New York nonprofit that channels US government grants abroad to fund such experiments.

The first set of documents related to the DEFUSE grant was published in December 2023. The above is an excerpt from a proposal email from March 2018 showing a comment from PD: Peter Daszak.

The first set of documents related to the DEFUSE grant was published in December 2023. The above is an excerpt from a proposal email from March 2018 showing a comment from PD: Peter Daszak.

The first set of documents related to the DEFUSE grant was published in December 2023. The above is an email from Peter Daszak to the researchers included in the 2018 proposal discussing the work that scientists must do as part of the project.

The first set of documents related to the DEFUSE grant was published in December 2023. The above is an email from Peter Daszak to the researchers included in the 2018 proposal discussing the work that scientists must do as part of the project.

The first set of documents related to the DEFUSE grant was published in December 2023. The above is an email from Peter Daszak to the researchers included in the 2018 proposal.

The first set of documents related to the DEFUSE grant was published in December 2023. The above is an email from Peter Daszak to the researchers included in the 2018 proposal.

Proposal documents previously published in December 2023 showed that the research team sought to synthesize spike proteins with furin cleavage sites that had been designed to bind to human receptors more easily.

The grant then proposed attaching furin to coronavirus strains and infecting mice to see how sick it would make them.

Furin has been one of the central points of the debate over the origin of Covid-19, with some experts claiming that it could only have been acquired through laboratory experiments.

It was what “supercharged” Covid until it became a highly transmissible pathogen.

The DEFUSE project’s plan was then to use drugs and vaccines to treat pathogens that had not yet emerged, effectively getting ahead of future pandemics.

The 2023 documents also showed how grant applicants attempted to mislead the Pentagon about how risky the experiments were in order to obtain funding.

Dr. Peter Daszak (pictured left with Dr. Anthony Fauci) oversees EcoHealth Alliance, the organization that applied for the 2018 grant.

Dr. Peter Daszak (pictured left with Dr. Anthony Fauci) oversees EcoHealth Alliance, the organization that applied for the 2018 grant.

They showed that the experiments were proposed to be carried out at the WIV, which has fewer safety precautions for working with potentially pandemic specimens than the US, which was advertised to the Department of Defense as a cost savings.

In initial proposals for DEFUSE, lab work would be performed in a biosafety level 2 laboratory, which researchers say would appeal to federal donors as “highly cost-effective” despite fewer safety precautions being taken. in lower level laboratories.

Dr. Ralph Baric, a well-known expert on manufacturing recombinant coronaviruses who was listed as a subcontractor on DEFUSE, acknowledged in an edited version of the proposal that U.S. researchers “would freak out” if they knew that novel coronaviruses were being tested and engineered. in a BSL. -2 laboratory.

Similar experiments are being carried out in the United States in BSL-3 laboratories.

A later version of the proposal changed BSL-2 to BSL-3.

In a December statement on the first set of documents, the EHA called them “incomplete” and said that “the allegations are false due to a misunderstanding of edits and comments in the document, and misleading quotes out of context and a lack of of information”. Understand the process by which federal grants are awarded.

The initial trove of documents from December detailing plans to create a Covid-like virus in China in 2018 made the “lab leak almost certain”, experts said at the time.

A year later, in late 2019, the Covid-19 virus emerged with a unique ability to infect humans, causing a global pandemic.

Dr. Ebright said…

Source Link > REVEALED: How American and Chinese scientists sought to create a virus in 2018 that was almost EXACT to Covid